Automated checks for journal papers & theses·Upload your document·Reports within minutes
Home Journal Papers Evaluator Methodology Check Statistical Consistency Check Publish Assist — coming soon Thesis & Dissertation Evaluator Methodology Check Statistical Consistency Check Viva Preparation Pricing Expert Consultations Blog Contact Pay Invoice Client Login
Free Consultation

Free vs Premium

Compare the depth of feedback before you choose.

The examples below show how a Free Diagnostic Review differs from a Premium Expert Review using the same section of a sample academic document.

Submission Reference: Not assigned Premium price shown after upload
Free Review

Diagnostic Feedback

Short, useful feedback showing the main issues detected in the work.

Research Foundation

Assessment: Moderate

The topic is relevant and the research direction is clear. The document identifies a meaningful area of enquiry, but the research gap needs to be stated more directly.

Main strengths

  • The topic is academically relevant.
  • The broad research aim is understandable.

Main concerns

  • The research gap needs clearer justification.
  • The contribution should be explained more explicitly.
Premium Expert Review

Detailed Improvement Guidance

Deeper, section-level feedback with specific actions and examiner/reviewer risk guidance.

Research Foundation

Assessment: Moderate, with clear potential for strengthening.

The research topic is promising, but the current version does not yet fully convert the topic into a defensible academic contribution. The gap should be moved from a general claim to a specific statement showing what previous studies have not yet explained, tested, compared, or theorised.

What should be improved

  • State the research gap in one direct paragraph near the end of the introduction.
  • Separate the practical problem from the academic gap.
  • Link each research objective to the stated gap.
  • Add 3–5 recent empirical studies to show exactly where the contribution sits.

Priority action

Rewrite the final introduction paragraph so that it answers: what is already known, what is still missing, why that missing issue matters, and how this study responds to it.

Premium Review includes

Detailed section-by-section critique
Methodology and analysis review
Reviewer/examiner risk assessment
Priority improvement roadmap
20+ detailed whole-document findings
One revision verification included
Continue with Free Review Upgrade to Premium