Thesis review — find it
before your examiner does.

Two people will read your thesis once, closely, and then ask you to defend it in person. Everything they will raise is already in your document today. The Evaluator finds it — 161 checks across structure, argument, evidence and reporting, on your own text, in minutes — while there is still time to act on every word of it.

The problem this solves

By the time a thesis is finished you cannot read it any more. You have lived inside the argument for years, and your eye reconstructs what you meant from what is actually on the page. The gap between those two things is invisible to you and completely visible to an examiner reading it for the first time.

The problems that produce major corrections are seldom subtle in hindsight. A contribution that is never stated in one sentence. A literature review that summarises rather than argues. Findings that drift beyond what the data supports. A methodology chapter that describes what was done without ever justifying why.

An examiner will find every one of these in a single afternoon. The Evaluator finds them in minutes, and tells you which to fix first. The problems are not the difference between a pass and a correction — when you find them is.

Who it is for

What the free report contains

Three sections, delivered within minutes of your upload.

What the premium report adds

Every dimension at once — not one at a time

This is the part that makes the difference, and it is worth being blunt about. A supervisor reads your work through their specialism. A statistician checks your numbers. A friend in your cohort reads it as a peer. Each of them gives you one view, and none of them gives you the view that matters — the whole document, assessed from every angle simultaneously, the way it will actually be judged.

That is what these engines do. They read the same document through several independent lenses in a single pass — methodological, theoretical, data-analytical, and specialised to your own field — and they do it in minutes rather than the weeks it takes to assemble that many expert opinions by hand.

The field-specialisation pass matters more than people expect. Generic academic advice is abundant and nearly worthless; what changes an outcome is knowing what your discipline treats as standard, which debates are live in your area, and which conventions a specialist reader will notice you have missed.

Why theses receive major corrections

Outright failure is rare. Major corrections are not, and they cost months. The causes are consistent enough to be worth stating plainly.

• The contribution is never stated in one sentence. If a reader cannot finish "this thesis contributes..." after reading your introduction, that is the first thing an examiner will press.
• A literature review that summarises instead of arguing. Chapter-length description of what others found, with no critical position and no gap constructed from it.
• Methodology described but not justified. What was done, without why it was the right thing to do.
• Findings that drift past the data. Interpretation gradually outrunning evidence across a long discussion chapter.
• Discussion disconnected from the literature review. Findings never brought back into conversation with the work set up two hundred pages earlier.
• Limitations treated as an afterthought. A short defensive section rather than genuine critical engagement with what the study cannot show.
• Internal inconsistency. Numbers, claims or terminology that disagree between chapters — almost inevitable in a document written over years.

None of these are subtle once someone points them out. All of them are extremely difficult to see in your own work, because you know what you meant.

Free Instant Review vs Deep Premium Review

Both run on the same engine and read the same document. The difference is depth, and what you are given to act on.

A worked comparison — the same passage of a document, reported both ways — is on the free versus premium page. It is the fastest way to judge whether the premium depth is worth it for your particular document.

How it works

1. Choose your check. Pick the report you want in the panel on this page. The price shown is the price charged — it is read from the same configuration the checkout bills from.
2. Verify your email. We send a six-digit code. This is how your report is tied to you and to nobody else, and it is why reports cannot be intercepted by someone who guesses a reference number.
3. Upload your document. PDF, DOCX or TXT, up to 50 MB. A full thesis, a single chapter or a manuscript all work.
4. Receive your report. Generated within minutes and delivered to the address you verified. Your document is deleted once the report exists.

What happens to your document

Your file is used for one purpose: producing your report. Once the report has been generated, the source document is deleted from our servers. It is not kept for training, it is not shared, and it is not readable by anyone who has not verified the email address the report belongs to.

This matters more for academic work than for most things people upload. An unpublished manuscript or an unexamined thesis is the one document in your career you cannot afford to have circulating, and a service that quietly retained it would be a liability rather than a help.

Common questions